United States v. McLoyd

540 F. App'x 174
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6850
StatusPublished

This text of 540 F. App'x 174 (United States v. McLoyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McLoyd, 540 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luther J. McLoyd appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the relief McLoyd sought. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir.2010) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of McLoyd’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. See United States v. McLoyd, No. 4:94-cr-00070-BO-16 (E.D.N.C. filed May 2, 2013 & entered May 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Munn
595 F.3d 183 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcloyd-ca4-2013.