United States v. McLean

135 F. App'x 274
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 2005
DocketNo. 04-13534; D.C. Docket Nos. 99-07359 CV-SH, 94-06114 CR-SH
StatusPublished

This text of 135 F. App'x 274 (United States v. McLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McLean, 135 F. App'x 274 (11th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the United States, appeals the district court’s order granting habeas relief to appellee Floyd McLean on his motion to vacate, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

The issues presented on appeal are (1) whether McLean’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for counsel’s failure to review a videotape with him so that McLean could enter into plea negotiations with the government related back to his original claims; and (2) if the claim related back, did McLean demonstrate sufficient prejudice due to his attorney’s inadequate performance.

We review a district court’s application of Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) for abuse of discretion. See Davenport v. United States, 217 F.3d 1341, 1343 n. 4 (11th Cir.2000).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s order granting McLean’s § 2255 motion.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davenport v. United States
217 F.3d 1341 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 F. App'x 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mclean-ca11-2005.