United States v. McLaurin

466 F. App'x 298
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2012·No. No. 11-5088·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Deangelo McLaurin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McLaurin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McLaurin, 466 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2012).

466 F. App'x 298 (United States v. McLaurin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)