United States v. McLaughlin
This text of 97 F. App'x 769 (United States v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alfred Dockery McLaughlin, IV, appeals his 30-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for attempted unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).
McLaughlin contends that the district court erred by denying his requested downward departure for reduced mental [770]*770capacity under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary denial of a request for departure, and we dismiss. See United States v. Smith, 330 F.3d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir.2003).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mclaughlin-ca9-2004.