United States v. McKinnon

307 F. App'x 618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McKinnon. Read the opinion of the Court — 301 F. App'x 117
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 4, 2008·No. Nos. 07-2290, 07-2523·Published

Opinion

[619]*619OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

This consolidated appeal arises from the dismissal of three pro se motions filed by McKinnon. The first two motions are the subject of the appeal at case number 07-2290, and the third is the subject of the appeal at case number 07-2523. McKinnon filed these pro se motions in the District Court while his direct appeal at case number 05-5314 was pending before us. The District Court dismissed the three motions in these two cases because it lacked jurisdiction. The filing of a notice of appeal removes a case from the District Court and places it under our jurisdiction. The District Court was correct. Because the District Court lacked jurisdiction, the dismissal was correct and typically would be affirmed. Because, however, the matter is before us in McKinnon’s other appeal, we will simply dismiss these two.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McKinnon, 307 F. App'x 618 (3d Cir. 2008).

307 F. App'x 618 (United States v. McKinnon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.