United States v. McKinney

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. McKinney

329 F. App'x 901

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 30, 2009·No. No. 09-10258·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Jesse Craig McKinney in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McKinney’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Jesse Craig McKinney in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McKinney’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. McKinney, 329 F. App'x 901 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

329 F. App'x 901 (United States v. McKinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related