United States v. McKay
This text of 56 F. App'x 813 (United States v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
James Robert McKay (“McKay”) lacked standing to challenge the search of the chicken coop, which was dilapidated and open to the elements. McKay did not pay rent for use of the chicken coop, and had no ability to exclude others from accessing it. McKay therefore fails to assert a subjective expectation of privacy that is objectively reasonable. See United States v. Silva, 247 F.3d 1051, 1055 (9th Cir.2001); United States v. Parks, 285 F.3d 1133, 1141 (9th Cir.2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mckay-ca9-2003.