United States v. McGlamry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6601
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DARRYL JAMES MCGLAMRY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:88-cr-00136-UA; 1:05-cv-00881-FWB)
Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 21, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl James McGlamry, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Darryl James McGlamry seeks to appeal the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his motion filed under former Fed. R. Crim.
P. 35. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. McGlamry, Nos. 2:88-cr-00136-UA;
1:05-cv-00881-FWB (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 16, 2006 & entered Mar. 17,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. McGlamry (United States v. McGlamry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.