United States v. McGlamry

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2007·No. 06-6601·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6601

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DARRYL JAMES MCGLAMRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:88-cr-00136-UA; 1:05-cv-00881-FWB)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 21, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl James McGlamry, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darryl James McGlamry seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his motion filed under former Fed. R. Crim.

P. 35. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. McGlamry, Nos. 2:88-cr-00136-UA;

1:05-cv-00881-FWB (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 16, 2006 & entered Mar. 17,

2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McGlamry, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. McGlamry (United States v. McGlamry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.