United States v. McGhee
This text of United States v. McGhee (United States v. McGhee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________
No. 201700291 _________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v.
AHARON M. MCGHEE Hospitalman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy Appellant _________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Captain Robert J. Crow, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Southeast, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Commander George W. Lucier, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Paul D. Jenkins, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________
Decided 11 January 2018 _________________________
Before M ARKS , W OODARD , and H INES , Appellate Military Judges _________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental court-martial order will reflect: Note 1: The military judge consolidated Specifications 1 and 2 of Additional Charge III into one specification for findings: Additional Charge III: CONSOLIDATED SPECIFICATION: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 90 (Willful disobedience of superior commissioned officer): In that Hospitalman Recruit Aharon M. McGhee, U.S. Navy, Navy Medicine Training Support Center, San Antonio, Texas, on active duty, having received a lawful command from Captain Brent M. Kelln, U.S. Navy, his superior commissioned officer, then known by the said Hospitalman Recruit Aharon M. McGhee, to be his superior commissioned officer, to surrender all entertainment portable electric devices and all mobile cellular devices to Command Master-At-Arms while restricted, or words to that United States v. McGhee No. 201700291
effect, did, at or near San Antonio, Texas, on or about 14 February 2017 and 28 February 2017, willfully disobey the same.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McGhee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcghee-nmcca-2018.