United States v. McGhee
This text of United States v. McGhee (United States v. McGhee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7677
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PERSONNE ELRICO MCGHEE, a/k/a Rico,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-46)
Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Personne Elrico McGhee, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Personne Elrico McGhee appeals a district court order
denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the
record and the district court order and find no error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. McGhee, No. CR-93-46 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 6, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McGhee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcghee-ca4-2004.