United States v. McGhee

Fourth Circuit

United States v. McGhee

86 F. App'x 572

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2004·No. No. 03-7677·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Personne Elrico McGhee appeals a district court order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McGhee, No. CR-93-46 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Personne Elrico McGhee appeals a district court order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McGhee, No. CR-93-46 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. McGhee, 86 F. App'x 572 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 572 (United States v. McGhee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.