United States v. McFadden

18 C.M.A. 370, 18 USCMA 370, 40 C.M.R. 82, 1969 CMA LEXIS 807, 1969 WL 6010
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided May 23, 1969·No. No. 21,914·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

The accused stands convicted of breaking restriction, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of $90.00 per month for a like period. Two prior convictions were considered. Ameliorating action by both the convening and supervisory authorities leave this accused with a suspended punitive discharge in addition to confinement at hard labor and forfeitures of two months’ duration.

The president’s instructions on sentencing included advice on matters that on the one hand “logically” indicated that a more severe sentence should be adjudged or, on the other, that a more lenient sentence should be given. Similar advice was considered in United States v Wright, 18 USCMA 348, 40 CMR 60. A majority of the Court there held the instruction correct. Our decision in that case is controlling here.

[371] The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

. Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McFadden, 18 C.M.A. 370, 18 USCMA 370, 40 C.M.R. 82, 1969 CMA LEXIS 807, 1969 WL 6010 (cma 1969).

18 C.M.A. 370 (United States v. McFadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wright
18 C.M.A. 348 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)