United States v. McFadden

18 C.M.A. 370, 18 USCMA 370, 40 C.M.R. 82, 1969 CMA LEXIS 807, 1969 WL 6010
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedMay 23, 1969
DocketNo. 21,914
StatusPublished

This text of 18 C.M.A. 370 (United States v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McFadden, 18 C.M.A. 370, 18 USCMA 370, 40 C.M.R. 82, 1969 CMA LEXIS 807, 1969 WL 6010 (cma 1969).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

The accused stands convicted of breaking restriction, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of $90.00 per month for a like period. Two prior convictions were considered. Ameliorating action by both the convening and supervisory authorities leave this accused with a suspended punitive discharge in addition to confinement at hard labor and forfeitures of two months’ duration.

The president’s instructions on sentencing included advice on matters that on the one hand “logically” indicated that a more severe sentence should be adjudged or, on the other, that a more lenient sentence should be given. Similar advice was considered in United States v Wright, 18 USCMA 348, 40 CMR 60. A majority of the Court there held the instruction correct. Our decision in that case is controlling here.

[371]*371The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

. Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wright
18 C.M.A. 348 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 C.M.A. 370, 18 USCMA 370, 40 C.M.R. 82, 1969 CMA LEXIS 807, 1969 WL 6010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcfadden-cma-1969.