United States v. McFadden
73 M.J. 293, 2014 WL 2964433, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 455
This text of 73 M.J. 293 (United States v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. McFadden, 73 M.J. 293, 2014 WL 2964433, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 455 (Ark. 2014).
Opinion
CCA 37438. Review granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE AFCCA ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE DID NOT ABUSE HIS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO EXCUSE FOR CAUSE A COURT MEMBER WHO ACCUSED APPELLANT OF LYING BY OMISSION BY EXERCISING HER ARTICLE 31(b), UCMJ, RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT.
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY DENYING DEFENSE COUNSEL’S REQUEST FOR A MISTRIAL AFTER A COURT MEMBER ACCUSED APPELLANT OF LYING BY OMISSION BY EXERCISING HER ARTICLE 31(b), UCMJ, RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 M.J. 293, 2014 WL 2964433, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcfadden-armfor-2014.