United States v. McDowell

73 M.J. 457, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 827
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided August 8, 2014·No. No. 14-5005/AF·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

CCA 2013-28. On consideration of the [458] issues certified by the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force, 73 M.J. 287 (C.A.A.F. 2014), the briefs of the parties and of the amici curiae, the motions of Protect Our Defenders and the alleged victim for leave to file amicus curiae briefs and make oral argument in support of Appellant, and the motions of the Real Party in Interest and Appellant to supplement the record, we conclude that the United States Ar Force Court of Criminal Appeals did not err in denying Appellant’s petition for extraordinary relief. Accordingly, it is ordered that the motions of Protect Our Defenders and the alleged victim to file amicus curiae briefs are hereby granted, that the motions of the Real Party in Interest and Appellant to supplement the record are hereby granted, that the motions of Protect Our Defenders and the alleged victim to make oral argument are hereby denied as moot, that the certified issues are answered in the negative, and the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McDowell, 73 M.J. 457, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 827 (Ark. 2014).

73 M.J. 457 (United States v. McDowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Yazzie
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 2016