United States v. McDonald Hicks, Eli Davis, Jr.

657 F.2d 244, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17955
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 8, 1981
Docket78-2534
StatusPublished

This text of 657 F.2d 244 (United States v. McDonald Hicks, Eli Davis, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McDonald Hicks, Eli Davis, Jr., 657 F.2d 244, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17955 (9th Cir. 1981).

Opinions

ORDER

Before WALLACE and TANG, Circuit Judges, and WHELAN,* District Judge.

The Supreme Court has vacated and remanded our initial disposition of this case, 625 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1980), vacated, [245]*245U.S. —, 101 S.Ct. 1752, 68 L.Ed.2d 233 (1981), in light of its decision in Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464, 101 S.Ct. 1200, 67 L.Ed.2d 437 (1981). Since then, another panel of this court has held that 18 U.S.C. § 2032, the statute involved in the case before us, does not deny equal protection of the law. United States v. Sangrey, 648 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1981). Therefore, we reverse the dismissal of the indictment against Hicks and Davis, and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County
450 U.S. 464 (Supreme Court, 1981)
United States v. McDonald Hicks, Eli Davis, Jr.
625 F.2d 216 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Dennis Sangrey
648 F.2d 597 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 F.2d 244, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcdonald-hicks-eli-davis-jr-ca9-1981.