United States v. McDonald Hicks, Eli Davis, Jr.
This text of 657 F.2d 244 (United States v. McDonald Hicks, Eli Davis, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The Supreme Court has vacated and remanded our initial disposition of this case, 625 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1980), vacated, — [245]*245U.S. —, 101 S.Ct. 1752, 68 L.Ed.2d 233 (1981), in light of its decision in Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464, 101 S.Ct. 1200, 67 L.Ed.2d 437 (1981). Since then, another panel of this court has held that 18 U.S.C. § 2032, the statute involved in the case before us, does not deny equal protection of the law. United States v. Sangrey, 648 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1981). Therefore, we reverse the dismissal of the indictment against Hicks and Davis, and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
657 F.2d 244, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcdonald-hicks-eli-davis-jr-ca9-1981.