United States v. McDonald
This text of 97 F. App'x 802 (United States v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[803]*803ORDER
McDonald has completed the entirety of his sentence and has established no collateral consequences — stigmatic or otherwise — sufficient to maintain the appeal. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998).
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcdonald-ca9-2004.