United States v. McDonald

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McDonald. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F. App'x 198
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 20, 1998·No. 97-7700·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7700

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWAYNE IVAN MCDONALD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-93-125-B, CA-97-1176-HNM)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Ivan McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen O'Connell Gavin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

in part his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McDonald, Nos. CR-93-125-B, CA-97-1176-HNM (D. Md. Oct. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McDonald, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. McDonald (United States v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related