United States v. McDaniel

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

United States v. McDaniel

26 F. Cas. 1073, 4 D.C. 721, 4 Cranch 721

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedMarch 15, 1836

StatusPublished

This text of 26 F. Cas. 1073 (United States v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. McDaniel, 26 F. Cas. 1073, 4 D.C. 721, 4 Cranch 721 (circtddc 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

The CouRT

(CRanch, C. J., doubting,)

refused to arrest the judgment, being of opinion that the averment that it was a banknote of the Union Bank of Georgetown, to the amount of ten dollars, of the value of ten dollars, was sufficient, and that it was not necessary to aver it to be a bank-note “ for the payment of money to the amount of ten dollars.” Verdict, guilty.

The Court sentenced the defendant to three years imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary, but he was pardoned by the President of the United States. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The CouRT

(CRanch, C. J., doubting,)

refused to arrest the judgment, being of opinion that the averment that it was a banknote of the Union Bank of Georgetown, to the amount of ten dollars, of the value of ten dollars, was sufficient, and that it was not necessary to aver it to be a bank-note “ for the payment of money to the amount of ten dollars.” Verdict, guilty.

The Court sentenced the defendant to three years imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary, but he was pardoned by the President of the United States. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 F. Cas. 1073, 4 D.C. 721, 4 Cranch 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcdaniel-circtddc-1836.