United States v. McCullers

673 F. App'x 338
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2017·No. No. 16-7131·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy R. McCullers, Jr., appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his motion filed in his criminal case under Fed R. Civ. P. 15(c)(2) to relate back a new claim to his previously adjudicated and denied 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. McCullers, No. 4:07-cr-00049-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the .decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McCullers, 673 F. App'x 338 (4th Cir. 2017).

673 F. App'x 338 (United States v. McCullers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related