United States v. McCullers

673 F. App'x 338
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7131
StatusPublished

This text of 673 F. App'x 338 (United States v. McCullers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McCullers, 673 F. App'x 338 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy R. McCullers, Jr., appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his motion filed in his criminal case under Fed R. Civ. P. 15(c)(2) to relate back a new claim to his previously adjudicated and denied 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. McCullers, No. 4:07-cr-00049-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the .decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 F. App'x 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mccullers-ca4-2017.