United States v. McCuin
Opinion
Case: 25-60555 Document: 67-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 25-60555 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ August 6, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jesse Ray McCuin,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:24-CR-38-1
Before Smith, Stewart, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Jesse McCuin appeals his conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He maintains that § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment, both on its face and as applied to him, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). He also contends that § 922(g)(1) is an unconstitutional extension of Congress ’s authority under the Commerce Clause and that there is an insufficient
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-60555 Document: 67-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2026
No. 25-60555
federal nexus between firearm possession and commerce.
Because McCuin properly preserved his constitutional challenges, we review them de novo. See United States v. Diaz, 116 F.4th 458, 462 (5th Cir. 2024), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2822 (2025). McCuin correctly concedes that all of his challenges are foreclosed by our precedent. See United States v. Schnur, 132 F.4th 863, 870–71 (5th Cir. 2025); Diaz, 116 F.4th at 471–72; United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 145 (5th Cir. 2013).
The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. McCuin (United States v. McCuin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.