United States v. McCoy

Seventh Circuit

United States v. McCoy

299 F. App'x 578

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 2008

DocketNo. 08-1674

StatusPublished

This text of 299 F. App'x 578 (United States v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. McCoy, 299 F. App'x 578 (7th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

The Anders brief filed by appellant’s counsel concludes that the district court’s decision — an order reducing appellant’s sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), though not by as much as appellant wanted — is not subject to appellate review. See United States v. McGee, 508 F.3d 442 (7th Cir.2007). Given an opportunity to respond, appellant has not done so. We agree with counsel that pursuing this appeal would be frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

The Anders brief filed by appellant’s counsel concludes that the district court’s decision — an order reducing appellant’s sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), though not by as much as appellant wanted — is not subject to appellate review. See United States v. McGee, 508 F.3d 442 (7th Cir.2007). Given an opportunity to respond, appellant has not done so. We agree with counsel that pursuing this appeal would be frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 F. App'x 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mccoy-ca7-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack