United States v. McCoy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McCoy. Read the opinion of the Court — 513 F.3d 405
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2009·No. 08-7741·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7741

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY W. MCCOY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:92-cr-00189-IMK-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy W. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Timothy W. McCoy appeals the district court’s orders

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration,

his petition for a writ of coram nobis, and his second motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. McCoy, No.

1:92-cr-00189-IMK-1 (N.D.W. Va. May 5 & Aug. 6, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McCoy, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. McCoy (United States v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.