United States v. McCovy
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
David Leroy McCovy appeals from the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
McCovy contends there was insufficient evidence to support the district court’s finding that he violated the condition of supervised release prohibiting him from entering any gambling establishment. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Jeremiah, 493 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
310 F. App'x 175 (United States v. McCovy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.