United States v. McCovy
This text of 310 F. App'x 175 (United States v. McCovy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
David Leroy McCovy appeals from the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
McCovy contends there was insufficient evidence to support the district court’s finding that he violated the condition of supervised release prohibiting him from entering any gambling establishment. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Jeremiah, 493 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mccovy-ca9-2009.