United States v. McConnaughey

135 F. 350, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 736, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4332
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 8, 1905·No. No. 1,365·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plea of res adjudicata is good. The record of the former judgment shows that the same question was involved in the suit of McConnaughey, administrator of Hoffman, against the United States, which was attempted to be relitigated in this case. That judgment determined that the plaintiff in the former suit was, as the personal representative of Johann Hoffman, entitled to receive and hold the remainder of unexpended pension money paid to or on account of Hoffman. Having recovered the same from the United States, they are not now entitled to have same paid back again by reason of any new right or title asserted herein.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McConnaughey, 135 F. 350, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 736, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4332 (6th Cir. 1905).

135 F. 350 (United States v. McConnaughey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.