United States v. McConaughy
33 F. 170, 13 Sawy. 143, 1887 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146
This text of 33 F. 170 (United States v. McConaughy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. McConaughy, 33 F. 170, 13 Sawy. 143, 1887 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146 (D. Or. 1887).
Opinion
These two cases were argued and submitted with the foregoing. The defendants are each indicted for perjury alleged to have been committed in depositions given by them as witnesses in the matter of the final proof of Martin MeConaughy’s desert-land entry. The demurrers to the indictments are sustained on the ground that it does not appear therefrom that the defendants were duly sworn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 F. 170, 13 Sawy. 143, 1887 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcconaughy-ord-1887.