United States v. McClinton

421 F. App'x 310
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2011
DocketNo. 10-7287
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 421 F. App'x 310 (United States v. McClinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McClinton, 421 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Charles McClinton appeals the district court’s order construing McClin-ton’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion and denying it as successive and unauthorized. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McClinton, No. 3:89-cr-00098-FDW-l (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hairston v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 792 (Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 F. App'x 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcclinton-ca4-2011.