United States v. McClellan

Third Circuit

United States v. McClellan

289 F.2d 319

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 2, 1961·No. Nos. 13253, 13254·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the defendant in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 194 F.Supp. 128. The action is brought pursuant to Section 2255 of the 28 U.S.C. The defendant, now appellant, moved to vacate a judgment of concurrent sentences imposed in 1959. The appellant’s argument consists largely of attacks upon his two court-appointed lawyers who get for their trouble charges of incompetence and improper professional conduct. We agree with the district court that there is no merit to the charges.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the defendant in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 194 F.Supp. 128. The action is brought pursuant to Section 2255 of the 28 U.S.C. The defendant, now appellant, moved to vacate a judgment of concurrent sentences imposed in 1959. The appellant’s argument consists largely of attacks upon his two court-appointed lawyers who get for their trouble charges of incompetence and improper professional conduct. We agree with the district court that there is no merit to the charges.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

United States v. McClellan, 289 F.2d 319 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

289 F.2d 319 (United States v. McClellan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related