United States v. McClam
This text of 515 F. App'x 214 (United States v. McClam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lacey McClam, Jr., appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his motion to compel defense counsel to produce documents. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. McClam has not demonstrated a particularized need or raised any specific issues in regard to the requested documents. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [215]*215the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 F. App'x 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcclam-ca4-2013.