United States v. McClam

Fourth Circuit

United States v. McClam

515 F. App'x 214

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2013·No. No. 12-7913·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lacey McClam, Jr., appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his motion to compel defense counsel to produce documents. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. McClam has not demonstrated a particularized need or raised any specific issues in regard to the requested documents. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [215] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lacey McClam, Jr., appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his motion to compel defense counsel to produce documents. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. McClam has not demonstrated a particularized need or raised any specific issues in regard to the requested documents. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [215] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. McClam, 515 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

515 F. App'x 214 (United States v. McClam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.