United States v. McCary

70 M.J. 27, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 310
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
DocketNo. 11-0243/AR
StatusPublished

This text of 70 M.J. 27 (United States v. McCary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McCary, 70 M.J. 27, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 310 (Ark. 2011).

Opinion

CCA 20090601. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, we conclude that Appellant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel in post-trial representation, where his trial defense counsel asserted in his clemency submission that Appellant had a prior federal conviction for violating a general order and adultery, when no such conviction was part of the record. Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN HIS TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL INCLUDED INCORRECT AND DAMAGING INFORMATION ABOUT OTHER CONVICTIONS IN HIS RCM 1105/1106 SUBMISSION, THEREBY FRUSTRATING APPELLANT’S CHANCES OF RECEIVING CLEMENCY.

The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed, and the convening authority’s action is set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General for a new action by the same or a different convening authority.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 M.J. 27, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mccary-armfor-2011.