United States v. McBride
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7691
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANNY GENE MCBRIDE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-263-G, CR-90-264-G, CR-90-265-G, CA- 97-575-6)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Gene McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Danny Gene McBride seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. McBride, Nos. CR-90-263-G; CR-90-264-
G; CR-90-265-G; CA-97-575-6 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. McBride (United States v. McBride) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.