United States v. Mazaret

696 F. App'x 986
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 24, 2017
DocketNo. 16-17080 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 696 F. App'x 986 (United States v. Mazaret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mazaret, 696 F. App'x 986 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Oscar Mazaret appeals his 37-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to import heroin and cocaine into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963 (an offense carrying a 20-year maximum penalty), Ma-zaret received a longer sentence than his two co-conspirators; the district court said this difference was due to Mazaret’s greater criminal history. We see no unwarranted disparity. The district court considered and rejected Mazaret’s arguments for miti[987]*987gation in weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and did not place undue weight on his criminal history. See United States v. Kuhlman, 711 F.3d 1321, 1327 (11th Cir. 2013). Mazaret’s sentence has not been shown to be substantively unreasonable.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rick A. Kuhlman
711 F.3d 1321 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 F. App'x 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mazaret-ca11-2017.