United States v. Maya-Pizano
This text of 699 F. App'x 629 (United States v. Maya-Pizano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ismael Maya-Pizano appealed the district court’s sentence prior to our decision in United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2017). Maya-Pizano concedes that Martinez-Lopez forecloses his appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the sentence.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 F. App'x 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maya-pizano-ca9-2017.