United States v. Maya-Flores

4 F. App'x 514
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2001
DocketNo. 00-50372; D.C. No. CR-00-00278-TJW
StatusPublished

This text of 4 F. App'x 514 (United States v. Maya-Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Maya-Flores, 4 F. App'x 514 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM3

Jose Aaron Maya-Flores appeals his 24 month sentence following a conviction by guilty plea to one count of importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960, and one count of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We dismiss.

Maya-Flores contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his request for a downward departure for aberrant behavior pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.20. Because the district court determined that it had the discretion to depart, but decided not to do so, its decision is not subject to appellate review. United States v. Timbana, 222 F.3d 688, 699 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 604, 148 L.Ed.2d 516 (2000).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John Timbana
222 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Carrillo Mendoza v. United States
531 U.S. 1028 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 F. App'x 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maya-flores-ca9-2001.