United States v. May
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41483 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDWARD MICHAEL MAY,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-444-1 -------------------- August 21, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Edward May has requested leave
to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). May has filed a pro
se response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and May’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is
excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. May (United States v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.