United States v. Maxwell S. Kraft

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Maxwell S. Kraft

25 F.3d 1115, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27105, 1994 WL 266177

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1994

Docket92-3235

StatusUnpublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1115 (United States v. Maxwell S. Kraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Maxwell S. Kraft, 25 F.3d 1115, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27105, 1994 WL 266177 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1115

306 U.S.App.D.C. 409

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Maxwell S. KRAFT, Appellant.

No. 92-3235.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 31, 1994.

Before: EDWARDS, GINSBURG, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant's motion to dismiss appeal as moot and to remand, and the government's response thereto, it is

ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed as moot and the judgment of conviction vacated. See Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481, 483 (1971). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the case be remanded to the district court for dismissal of the indictment.

The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith to the district court a certified copy of this order in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI