United States v. Maxwell S. Kraft

25 F.3d 1115, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27105, 1994 WL 266177
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 31, 1994·No. 92-3235·Unpublished

Opinion

25 F.3d 1115

306 U.S.App.D.C. 409

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Maxwell S. KRAFT, Appellant.

No. 92-3235.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 31, 1994.

Before: EDWARDS, GINSBURG, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant's motion to dismiss appeal as moot and to remand, and the government's response thereto, it is

ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed as moot and the judgment of conviction vacated. See Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481, 483 (1971). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the case be remanded to the district court for dismissal of the indictment.

The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith to the district court a certified copy of this order in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maxwell S. Kraft, 25 F.3d 1115, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27105, 1994 WL 266177 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

25 F.3d 1115 (United States v. Maxwell S. Kraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durham v. United States
401 U.S. 481 (Supreme Court, 1971)