United States v. Maxwell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Maxwell

208 F. App'x 275

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2006·No. 06-7648·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd G. Maxwell appeals the district court’s order margin order denying his “Notice of Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to Amend his Writ of Error Coram Nobis.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Maxwell v. United States, No. l:93-cr-00262-AVB (E.D.Va. Sept. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd G. Maxwell appeals the district court’s order margin order denying his “Notice of Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to Amend his Writ of Error Coram Nobis.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Maxwell v. United States, No. l:93-cr-00262-AVB (E.D.Va. Sept. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Maxwell, 208 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

208 F. App'x 275 (United States v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.