United States v. Maxwell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Maxwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 F. App'x 410
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2001·No. 01-6929·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6929

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-262-A, CA-97-382-AM)

Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his Motion for Relief from Judgment and for Leave to Amend

Pleadings. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Maxwell, Nos. CR-93-

262-A; CA-97-382-AM (E.D. Va. May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maxwell, (4th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Maxwell (United States v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.