United States v. Maximo Mateo-Medina

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Maximo Mateo-Medina. Read the opinion of the Court — 845 F.3d 546 →

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 3, 2017·No. 15-2862·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No 15-2862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MAXIMO MATEO-MEDINA

a/k/a David Contreras

a/k/a Luis Nieves a/k/a/ Joseph Robles, Maximo Mateo-Medina,

Appellant

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-15-cr-00055-001)

ORDER

At the direction of the Court, the opinion and judgment entered on December 30, 2016 are hereby VACATED.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: January 3, 2017 tyw/cc: Brett G. Sweitzer, Esq.

Bernadette A. McKeon, Esq. Clare P. Pozos, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No 15-2862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MAXIMO MATEO-MEDINA

a/k/a David Contreras

a/k/a Luis Nieves a/k/a/ Joseph Robles, Maximo Mateo-Medina,

Appellant

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-15-cr-00055-001)

ORDER

At the direction of the Court, the opinion and judgment entered on December 30, 2016 are hereby VACATED.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: January 3, 2017 tyw/cc: Brett G. Sweitzer, Esq.

Bernadette A. McKeon, Esq. Clare P. Pozos, Esq.

United States v. Maximo Mateo-Medina, (3d Cir. 2017).

Pincite

United States v. Maximo Mateo-Medina (United States v. Maximo Mateo-Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.