United States v. Maxie Moore
This text of 479 F. App'x 156 (United States v. Maxie Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Maxie A. Moore appeals from the district court’s amended judgment issued following this court’s remand in United States v. Moore, 449 Fed.Appx. 677 (9th Cir.2011) (unpublished). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Moore’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Moore filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
Moore’s motion for appointment of new counsel, received on April 20, 2012, is DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maxie-moore-ca9-2012.