United States v. Maxie Moore

479 F. App'x 156
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2012·No. 11-30336·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maxie A. Moore appeals from the district court’s amended judgment issued following this court’s remand in United States v. Moore, 449 Fed.Appx. 677 (9th Cir.2011) (unpublished). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Moore’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Moore filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

Moore’s motion for appointment of new counsel, received on April 20, 2012, is DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maxie Moore, 479 F. App'x 156 (9th Cir. 2012).

479 F. App'x 156 (United States v. Maxie Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)