United States v. Maxie Moore

479 F. App'x 156
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 2012
Docket11-30336
StatusUnpublished

This text of 479 F. App'x 156 (United States v. Maxie Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Maxie Moore, 479 F. App'x 156 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maxie A. Moore appeals from the district court’s amended judgment issued following this court’s remand in United States v. Moore, 449 Fed.Appx. 677 (9th Cir.2011) (unpublished). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Moore’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Moore filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

Moore’s motion for appointment of new counsel, received on April 20, 2012, is DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Maxie Moore
449 F. App'x 677 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maxie-moore-ca9-2012.