United States v. Maurie Wade Shields, A/K/A Chip

65 F.3d 900, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26092, 1995 WL 545376
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 13, 1995
Docket93-9270
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 65 F.3d 900 (United States v. Maurie Wade Shields, A/K/A Chip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Maurie Wade Shields, A/K/A Chip, 65 F.3d 900, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26092, 1995 WL 545376 (11th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion April 10, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 49 F.3d 707)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Maurie Wade Shields, A/K/A Chip
87 F.3d 1194 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Shields
49 F.3d 707 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 F.3d 900, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26092, 1995 WL 545376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maurie-wade-shields-aka-chip-ca11-1995.