United States v. Maurice Poindexter

81 F. App'x 625
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 1, 2003
Docket03-1968
StatusUnpublished

This text of 81 F. App'x 625 (United States v. Maurice Poindexter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Maurice Poindexter, 81 F. App'x 625 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a bench trial, Maurice Poindexter was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Poindexter requested that his federal sentence be ordered to run concurrently with his undischarged state probation-revocation sentence. Rejecting that request, the district court 1 imposed a 120-month prison term to run consecutively to his state sentence, plus 3 years supervised release. Poindexter appeals.

Upon de novo review, see United States v. Ashley, 342 F.3d 850, 852 (8th Cir.2003), we affirm the sentence imposed by the district court, see United States v. Smith, 282 F.3d 1045, 1047-48 (8th Cir.2002) (U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3, comment.(n.6) is binding on federal sentencing courts and mandates that sentence imposed on defendant for crime committed during probation must run consecutively to any resulting sentence for probation revocation).

1

. The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Shawn M. Smith
282 F.3d 1045 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Charles Michael Ashley
342 F.3d 850 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 F. App'x 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maurice-poindexter-ca8-2003.