United States v. Maurice Phillips
This text of United States v. Maurice Phillips (United States v. Maurice Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS THIRD CIRCUIT _____________
No. 13-3592 _____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MAURICE PHILLIPS, Appellant _____________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Crim. No. 2-07-cr-00549-001) District Judge: Hon. J. Curtis Joyner _____________
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1 (a) (July 22, 2014) ______________
BEFORE: McKEE, Chief Judge, CHAGARES, Circuit Judge, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
______________
JUDGMENT ORDER ______________
After considering the contentions raised by appellant, to-wit, that the District
Court erred abused its discretion in denying Appellant’s emergency motion to stay
enforcement of the court’s preliminary order of forfeiture for substitute asset.
The Honorable Anne E. Thompson, Senior District Judge of New Jersey, sitting by designation. On consideration whereof and in light of our disposition of United States v.
Phillips, 589 F. App’x 64 (3d Cir. 2014) cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 2911 (2015), it is now
here ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the said District
Court entered July 25, 2013, be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
By the Court,
s/Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge
Attest:
s/Marcia M. Waldron Clerk
Dated: January 26, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Maurice Phillips, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maurice-phillips-ca3-2016.