United States v. Maurice Malone
This text of 669 F. App'x 813 (United States v. Maurice Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Maurice Malone appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms;
The district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Merrival, 521 F.3d 889, 890 (8th Cir. 2008) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). The within-Guidelines-range sentence was not substantively unreasonable, and the court considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.. See United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (under substantive-reasonableness test, district court abuses its discretion if it fails to consider relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing factors).
The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted,
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maurice-malone-ca8-2016.