United States v. Maurice M. ONeal

568 F. App'x 732
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 5, 2014·No. 13-12720·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Matthew L. Waters, appointed counsel for Maurice Oneal in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re *733 veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Oneal’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maurice M. ONeal, 568 F. App'x 732 (11th Cir. 2014).

568 F. App'x 732 (United States v. Maurice M. ONeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)