United States v. Maurice L. Jarrett

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: March 1, 1996
• Docket: 95-2431
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

___________

No. 95-2431 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Maurice L. Jarrett, also known * as Maurice L. Butler, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

Submitted: February 23, 1996

Filed: March 1, 1996 ___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Maurice L. Jarrett appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 following Jarrett's guilty plea to drug offenses. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

The sole argument raised in the Anders brief is that the district court erred in denying Jarrett's motion for a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, which Jarrett based on the United States Sentencing Commission's February 1995 report concluding that the 100-to-1 ratio between the penalties for crack cocaine and powder cocaine was not justified, and a proposed Guidelines amendment--which would have eliminated the 100-to-1 ratio--forwarded by the Commission to Congress for its

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. consideration. Jarrett's downward-departure argument is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Higgs, 72 F.3d 69, 70 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (Commission's February 1995 report is not basis upon which court can rely to grant § 5K2.0 downward departure; also noting that Congress rejected Commission's recommended Guidelines amendment).

After reviewing the record on appeal in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-