United States v. Matthews

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2009
Docket2009-1106
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Matthews (United States v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Matthews, (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1106

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARTHA MATTHEWS (also known as Martha O’Grady), NORTH STAR METALS, LLC, DANIEL MCGUIRE, and MCGUIRE STEEL ERECTION CORP.,

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

TAE BAK RESOURCES CO., LTD. and HAESUNG CORP.,

Third-Party Defendants- Appellees.

Stephen C. Tosini, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director. Of counsel was Kevin M. Green, Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Customs and Border Protection, of New Orleans, Louisiana.

Lawrence W. Hanson, The Law Office of Lawrence W. Hanson, P.C., of Houston, Texas, argued for defendants/third-party plaintiffs-appellants.

Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade

Judge Evan J. Wallach NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1106

MARTHA MATTHEWS (also known as Martha O’Grady), NORTH STAR METALS, LLC, DANIEL MCGUIRE, and MCGUIRE STEEL ERECTION CORP.,

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs- Appellants,

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Court of International Trade

in CASE NO(S). 04-00162

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER, and PROST).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Matthews, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-matthews-cafc-2009.