United States v. Matthews
Opinion
Case: 25-11014 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 25-11014 February 27, 2026 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Christin Miranda Matthews,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:25-CR-8-2 ______________________________
Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Christin Miranda Matthews has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Matthews has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-11014 Document: 51-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2026
No. 25-11014
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Matthews (United States v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.