United States v. Matthews
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-60310 Summary Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTOINE MATTHEWS,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-125 - - - - - - - - - - March 29, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant appeals his jury conviction and sentence for
conspiracy to possess cocaine base, 21 U.S.C. § 846, and use of a
communication facility in furtherance of a drug crime, 21 U.S.C.
§ 843(b), complaining of insufficiency of the evidence and
attacking the constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines
disparate treatment of cocaine base and cocaine powder. Our
review of the record and the arguments and authorities convince
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-60310 -2-
us that no reversibile error was committed. The evidence was not
insufficient. See United States v. Gallo, 927 F.2d 815, 820-21
(5th Cir. 1991). Appellant's challenges to the constitutionality
of the guidelines are without merit. See United States v.
Fisher, 22 F.3d 574, 579-80 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct.
529 (1994) (Eighth Amendment challenge); United States v. Watson,
953 F.2d 895, 897-98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 928
(1992) (due process and equal protection challenges).
Appellant's motion to strike portions of the Government's brief
is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Matthews (United States v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.