United States v. Matthews
This text of 577 F. App'x 146 (United States v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael F. Matthews appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to enforce the plea agreement and denying subsequent motions seeking reconsideration or to supplement the motion to enforce the plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See United States v. Matthews, No. 3:07-cr-00226-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 28, 2013; Feb. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
577 F. App'x 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-matthews-ca4-2014.