United States v. Matthew Sawyer
This text of 329 F. App'x 38 (United States v. Matthew Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Matthew Sawyer appeals from the twenty-four month sentence imposed by the district court 1 following Sawyer’s violation *39 of the conditions of his supervised release. Sawyer argues that resentencing is required because the district court did not adequately consider the relevant factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a). Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the sentence imposed is reasonable and that the district court adequately explained its reasons for imposing it. See, e.g., United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107 (8th Cir.2008); United States v. Bear Robe, 521 F.3d 909 (8th Cir.2008); United States v. Merrival, 521 F.3d 889 (8th Cir.2008).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-matthew-sawyer-ca8-2009.