United States v. Matthew Sawyer

329 F. App'x 38
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 2009
Docket08-3089
StatusUnpublished

This text of 329 F. App'x 38 (United States v. Matthew Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Matthew Sawyer, 329 F. App'x 38 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Sawyer appeals from the twenty-four month sentence imposed by the district court 1 following Sawyer’s violation *39 of the conditions of his supervised release. Sawyer argues that resentencing is required because the district court did not adequately consider the relevant factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a). Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the sentence imposed is reasonable and that the district court adequately explained its reasons for imposing it. See, e.g., United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107 (8th Cir.2008); United States v. Bear Robe, 521 F.3d 909 (8th Cir.2008); United States v. Merrival, 521 F.3d 889 (8th Cir.2008).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Perkins
526 F.3d 1107 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Bear Robe
521 F.3d 909 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Merrival
521 F.3d 889 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 F. App'x 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-matthew-sawyer-ca8-2009.