United States v. Matthew

328 F. App'x 876
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2009·No. 08-7031·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Justin Matthew seeks to appeal the district court’s February 11, 2008, 2008 WL 394822, order. The order provided Matthew with notice that the district court intended to construe correspondence received from Matthew as his first 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion to vacate his 2007 criminal convictions, in accordance with this court’s holding in United States v. Emmanuel, 288 F.3d 644, 649 (4th Cir.2002). The district court’s order also directed Matthew to respond to the order within twenty days, indicating whether he desired the district court to consider his correspondence as a § 2255 motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Matthew seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral oi'der. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Matthew, 328 F. App'x 876 (4th Cir. 2009).

328 F. App'x 876 (United States v. Matthew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)
United States v. Shahborn Emmanuel
288 F.3d 644 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)